A
male
age
30-35,
anonymous
writes:If you were a man looking for a women and her sexual past was a key indication on if you would take the relationship seriously. Would you pick a girl that had 0-1 previous partners or 2+. They are both very nice and intelligent. Would you take a girl that already knew what to do or someone you could mold into doing things the way you wanted. Because right now I have 2 girls who are very nice. One has only had sex one time only for 1 minute and stopped and hasnt done anything else before. The other one has had sex numerous times including oral and all sorts of other stuff both of them are UCLA grads and highly intelligent I may add.
View related questions:
sexual past Reply to this Question
Share |
Fancy yourself as an agony aunt? Add your answer to this question! A
female
reader, anonymous, writes (2 October 2011): whoever I get on with more. sexual history is none of my business.
A
female
reader, Basschick  +, writes (1 October 2011):
 One's sexual history rarely dictated who you should be with because you should pick the one that excites YOU, interests you, stimulates your mind and your body. Who is the most fun to be around? Who do you have the most in common with. Be damned their sexual past. It should really not matter unless they've been with literally hundreds of other men, then I might worry.
...............................
A
female
reader, anonymous, writes (1 October 2011): wow. If you are going to choose a girl based on her history and so that you can have an easier time 'molding her' into what you want, then you don't deserve either of them. Is there nothing else about these girls that you like or make them different from each other?
...............................
A
reader, anonymous, writes (1 October 2011): I would take the less partner one if you are concerned about it. It's jealousy and you can't control it. I would also like to be with a girl who we could mold chemistry together rather than me following what she does.
...............................
|
