A
female
age
41-50,
anonymous
writes:I'm a bit disturbed about some clips I've seen in my boyfriend's computer. The setting is in the shower after a seven a side tag rugby match between men and adolescent boys and women, they're all taking a shower together but wearing underpants and knickers. The women have removed their bras, which explains why all the men and boys have erections under their underpants,and 4 of the women have pubic hair showing from the sides or top of or through their tight wet panties. I think such things are sickeining and wonder if my boyfriend has a problem. Can you advise me, I'm worried.
View related questions:
erection, pubic hair Reply to this Question
Share |
Fancy yourself as an agony aunt? Add your answer to this question! A
male
reader, anonymous, writes (26 March 2008): The males (especially the boys)were obviously erect because they saw some of the women's pubic hairs and not because they saw their breasts! No one would have an erection because of a breast nowadays!
A
female
reader, anonymous, writes (20 March 2008): Thank you, Stroller, for your help. I would say the boys were about 16 but they were not approached by anyone. Their erections obviously resulted from their seeing bare breasts and, perhaps, from seeing the 4 women's pubic hair, of which quite a lot was visible, too much for it to be accidental, escaping from their tight panties. I've had another look in his documents and there are quite a lot of pictures where women in panties are showing pubic hairs but only one where a boy of about 16 had an erection facing a mature, bare-breasted woman with a dozen or so hairs sprouting from one side of black panties. Thanks for your analysis. I'll talk to my boyfriend.
...............................
A
male
reader, agtorange  +, writes (19 March 2008):
 The boys being there is a bit strange, it sounds like you've stumbled upon a porn video on his computer.
If there's children involved in the tape you need to question him, he could have problems, but if it's just a run of the mill porn you happened to stumble upon, it's really no big deal.
...............................
A
male
reader, Stroller +, writes (19 March 2008):
 You need to talk to him, not us.
Without context, it's impossible to say whether he's normal or a kiddy-fiddler. If he has a normal collection of completely-adult-and-straight porn then this is just probably something whacky that he downloaded accidentally (without knowing the content) - he'll probably laugh and be happy to delete it as soon as you mention it. I have to admit that this clip sounds curiously intriguing - it's probably not illegal and I can see how compelling it might be - one might not immediately remove something like this from one's computer.
On the other hand, this sounds like the shallow waters of child porn. If there's zillions of other nasty files on his PC then you know what to do. Considering the way you say the camera focusses then I would be quite worried about the voyeuristic tendencies of the person making the recording.
I guess the reason you haven't talked to your b/f is that fear he'll think you've been sneaking around on his computer. I work on people's PCs for a living and I know how easily one could find personal files simply by clicking on "My Documents" or even accidentally on the wrong folder within that directory. It's particularly easy to do when the PC is a slow one and the screen takes a while to catch up with your clicks. On the other had, there is lots of stuff on most people's PCs that you'd never find without snooping around for it (I make a point of never doing so) - if it's the case that you've been snooping then you just have to fess up and confront him.
Finally, I'd better say that I have accidentally stumbled upon proper-nasty child-porn, which was on a shared-and-unsecured computer in my university department some years ago. That was a fairly-graphic and disturbing video and I can tell you that the film you saw is nothing compared to what one could easily find on the net if one went looking for it. Yes, I would be concerned about the maker of the clip, but one finding it might merely have failed to delete it out of a sense of woah-look-at-this-weird-shit-I-found-on-the-net.
...............................
A
female
reader, anonymous, writes (19 March 2008): Thank you, Lazy Guy, for your answer to my question which has allowed me to see why the clips disturb me. Yes, the camera focusses on breasts and erections and visible pubic hair. I think it's not decent for boys 12 to 17 to see women's pubic hair and to get an erection from it.
...............................
A
male
reader, LazyGuy  +, writes (19 March 2008):
 What exactly is it that you have a problem with?
Is the camera focussing on body parts or is it just a vid of people horsing around?
Topless? Pretty normal on beaches, yes men will react to that, but if the video ain't focussing on the erotic aspect then what is the big deal? Should every woman be forced to wear nipple shields to avoid seeming arroused?
What is the video for anyway, is it a homevid of his mates?
Sorry, but unless it is part of his porn collection I can't see anything wrong with it.
Without more info you come of as sounding very puritine, shouldn't women be allowed to go topless in your opinion on say beaches or around men?
Also what is adolescent? Couldn't that be anything from 12 to 18, BIG difference, remember, boys look younger longer then girls do. An 18yr old make and an 18yr old female can easily be mistaken for a young boy and a mature woman.
...............................
|
