A
male
age
30-35,
anonymous
writes:If there were no marriage, and contraception was 100% effective, it seems to me that generally speaking, girls (specifically, girls in the hottest 20%), would choose guys based on rank/status relative to other guys.Not that these girls would choose the ultimate guy they can get, just as long as he is in the top range.EG. If 80% of girls can get a guy to have sex, these girls would choose a guy in the best 40%.The top 50% of these girls would favor the top 20% of all guys.To girls in the most attractive 20%, is this idea true or false? Are girls even aware of their sexuality as it is without covering it up with 'love' and cultural programming? If you are a girl answering, how would others rate your physical attractiveness out of 10?PS. This idea does not appear to apply to guys. A girl's sexiness is primarily in her looks and you can only look so good before you start looking ridiculous/fake. Reply to this Question
Share |
Fancy yourself as an agony aunt? Add your answer to this question! A
female
reader, So_Very_Confused +, writes (12 June 2012):
 Your question is bogus. Your ideas are trying to figure out CHEMISTRY and make it mathematical. It does NOT work that way. Attraction is not scientific. It’s emotional. It’s vague.
What is attractive to me is not what is attractive to someone else. This is why they make vanilla strawberry and chocolate… so you have choices.
And to be honest women are NOT denying sex based just on wanting to get married or not get pregnant.
I’m pretty hot for a woman of my age… I’m 52. My fiancé is 39 he thinks I’m hot… I was adorable as a girl of your age range too but that was many years ago and I guess cute and desirable was deemed different back in the 70s… oh yeah when we had free love… and no AIDS or HIV…
A
male
reader, anonymous, writes (11 June 2012): It might be complete BS but I've read that 'genetic studies' show that we are all descended from twice as many women than men (this is pre-modern era stuff, before marriage was invented). Meaning a smaller percentage of men reproduced with multiple women. History does not paint a pretty picture for men. Just the men at the top. Even today, when feminists compare themselves to men, they mostly compare their situation with the top men, not the average men.
So yes, this is what I've thought about for a few minutes. And yes, it is generalising which is why I wrote, 'generally speaking'.
...............................
A
female
reader, anonymous, writes (11 June 2012): Seriously, you've jotted down a bunch of nonsense in statistical form. Women aren't just numbers, programmed to go after another number, a man's salary. Or his looks, for that matter. My attractiveness level? 9/10 and if a man who is in the "top 10" is an idiot, I would rather settle for the less attractive one, but the one who will listen to me and is a decent person. Get a grip and don't generalize women. We are all completely different.
...............................
A
female
reader, Justinara  +, writes (11 June 2012):
seriously, is this what you will spend your day thinking about? But if you want to know the answer, yes, hot girls want a guy who is ranked high. The idea is the hot girl provide beauty (that's her asset) the dude provides her with security (ranks, money etc. But life is not clear cut as this.
If you are able to love and make the woman you love feel good, and you lead her, like no other men can lead her than you are ranked high. Theories are great on paper but not in real life.
...............................
A
female
reader, Starlights +, writes (11 June 2012):
 My personal answer is that every girl is different; what my friends look for in guys IS TOTALLY different to what i look for; trust me!
there are similarities of course; every girl likes a guy to treat her good; but in terms of looks thats a personal thing.
Thats just my answer to your question, its very shallow to generalise women / girls based on a selective group you've seen through your life; because depending where you go in this world and depending on the women; we are all different in personalities and nature.
...............................
|
