A
male
age
,
bharat mehta
writes:Relationship is problem, perhaps most fatal problem. All destructive event like murder to suicide occur from bad terms of relations. It is also true that men cannot live without relating with something or with someone. So, it is quite necessary to understand the root of relationship in terms of cause and effect. In relationship, something must be work as cause or root and other as effect or action. If this law of cause and effect is properly realized, I think one can direct relationship successfully. It is like a one master key that solve all problem; known problem as well as problem yet not known.The first thing about relationship is that relationship itself is action or effect, and not cause or not a principle in-it-self. Relationship is product of human consciousness or mind. It is necessity of life and also of mind to relate with something and with some one for different purpose.'sex' is principle purpose for relationship, and it demands everything from life, and give everything to life in return. It demand highest wisdom and give highest heaven, human mind usually dream, and do nothing for sex. Sex is objective reality, but our culture call it mystical...means unknowable. Religious thinker call it as 'setan ! ' Even our perceptual vision reported it as dirt ! And our mind stop with hesitation to achieve conceptual vision, which give real vision of spiritual aspect of sex.Humanity before religious culture came in to being, hold sexuality as Religion! To-day it is known as esoteric tradition, kabblah and free masonry. In India it is known as 'Tantra'. This was the earlier form of religion, who taught spiritual aspect of sexuality. It is far greater then any any sexology.At the beginning of religious culture; one thinker hold, that humanity has lost its grasp on reasoning, and also lost its heaven, gifted by nature.The principle I quoted is termed as 'Principle of Unity'; unity of mind and matter. Without knowledge of this principle, relationship can certainly be a deadly problem. It is not possible to say everyhing about this principle in one article, hence I will write many other article, which will guide human mind and in turn direct the problem of relationship. Reply to this Article
Share |
You can add your comments or thoughts to this article A
male
reader, bharat mehta +, writes (30 November 2009):
bharat mehta is verified as being by the original poster of the question I understand your ideas, about language. I will be careful, and sure, I am very much thankful for your suggestion and observation. I feel pleasure that you know about Tantra. Yes, this tantra is really the root of philosophy, or in Indian terms, DRSHAN. It is science of Vision. And, this tantra is really not realized, in cultural context.
Ancient kamasutra or modern sexology is some what easy, because it speak about concrete particular problem. Tantra is not easy. In principle, tantra do not speak about male-female relationship, but about mind and matter relationship, in terms of Shiva and Shakti. It is not easy, as it is abstraction. Ling stand for Shiva, and Yoni stand for Shakti. It is not exactly male and female. plain anatomical interpretation is misleading. Many many scholars also take mistaken view, and hold tantric ling and tantric yoni is representation of male and female. It is mistaken view. Ling and yoni are symbolic. This symbole do not discuss sexual relationship of male and female but unity of mind and matter. When one realize the concept of UNITY, then he will judge sexual problem quite easily.
However, all this things are not difficult, but complicated. It is an attempt to lead our mind toward 'non-material realm', by using materialistic symbole...say ling and yoni.
Anyway, first I have to write an Independent article, followed by other many many articles, that will help us all to deal with reality easily, but first it is sure very difficult.
I am thankful for your co-operation. Please say me whatever you feel about my work. I am taking your work as creative...and,I am not thinking that you are hurting me, but you are co-operating me for something better. THANKS.
I am sure and certain,
A
male
reader, DoubleM  +, writes (30 November 2009):
 My comment is intended to help, not hurt. The Tantric teachings are based on thousands of years of wisdom and should be shared, which to some degree I have tried to do here for more than two years. It is simply that for you to express your thoughts in the English language, it is best to be quite accurate. Otherwise, many will not bother to read and will not understand.
...............................
A
male
reader, bharat mehta +, writes (30 November 2009):
bharat mehta is verified as being by the original poster of the questionI note your comment about my language, you observe. You say you know very well about the wisdom of Kamasutra. And, yes here is the differences. Root of my ideas is not Kama-sutra. Kama-sutra is science that talk about relationship between male and female, is entirely different context. I am talking about relationship of mind and matter, or sex and spirit. My context is wider, say universal. The context of kama-sutra is not wider, say it is racial, it talk about relationship between male and female.
To understand the relationship between male and female in sexual context can be difficult, and it is proved very difficult also, without universal context, which I want to present here.
This universal context, about 'sex and spirit' is entirely unknown to our culture. I wish to make familiar. Problem arise with particular individual life, but to view them correctly, required higher vision...say universal vision. My attempt is beginning...I thank you, for your comment, which itself give me valuable guidance.
...............................
A
male
reader, DoubleM +, writes (29 November 2009):
After trying to read two of your postings, may I suggest that your wording, spelling and syntax are very difficult to comprehend. Sorry, because I'm quite aware of the wisdom involved with Kama Sutra, but your spelling is incomplete and possibly your lack of fluency in English is the problem.
...............................
|
