A
female
age
36-40,
anonymous
writes:Hi there, i am after some advice (sexually). I was with a bloke last week who was uncircumsized and this was like the first time for me.He wants to see me and has asked me to give him a good sucking but the thing is i'm quite nervous and scared of what to do coz all the other men i been with have been circumsized!Please help:s Reply to this Question
Share |
Fancy yourself as an agony aunt? Add your answer to this question! A
female
reader, anonymous, writes (22 November 2008): omg ,,, look is actually the same thing :S well. there maybe be girls that like circumcised more than uncircumcised but in the end you get used to it .. u can't dump your BF cuz he's uncircumcised or circumcised ..... and about disease's etc.. : is the same!! if the guy take good care of his penis it will be just fine..
A
female
reader, anonymous, writes (29 October 2008): To the gentlman "cowboy" thanks for explaining to people the benefits and advantage of being circumsized. (I wish it was compulsory).
I am a woman and I love doing fellatio, but I will NEVER do oral on an uncircumsized penis. (In fact I cannot stand the look of it).
To the person who asked the question:
You will enjoy fellatio with this uncircumsized partner it is great, it is the BEST.
ENjoy!
...............................
A
male
reader, Cowboy  +, writes (29 October 2008):
Sorry, but that's nonsense.
I have been both uncircumcised and circumcised during the time I have been sexually active, and the difference is enormous.
The lack of foreskin does mean that a different technique is required.
I happen to vastly prefer being cut to uncut, and the prospect of gaining the myriad benefits of being circumcised is the reason why I opted to do it.
If it grew back, I'd have it cut off again in a heartbeat.
It's not natural to shave your face, cut your nails and hair, brush your teeth, wash with soap, receive medical treatment, or wear clothes, but I doubt many people would object to any of those things.
In fact, if you think about it, circumcision has been around a lot longer than most of these things.
You say you can't understand why anyone would subject themself to this. Well here's why I did:
It looks nicer.
This is a matter of opinion, but you seldom see an uncut porn star...
It's cleaner.
I know you can wash your penis, but it's not the same. Wash in the morning, and go jogging on a hot day. In the evening, your penis will smell, and mine will not.
No smegma.
It is impossible for me to get smegma. Smegma is one of the causes of cervical cancer in women.
It improves sex for the man.
I have had sex both circumcised and uncircumcised. Circumcised is much better, because you are not moving within your own foreskin. It feels just as good on the way out as it does on the way in. Oral sex is far, far more pleasurable.
It improves sex for the woman.
Aside from the fact that the penis will be cleaner, having tight skin on the shaft means that there is a lot more friction and therefore pleasure.
The head of the penis gets bigger.
Without the pressure of the foreskin holding it back, the glans gets wider.
Less likely to get diseases.
Phimosis and balanitis are impossible to get, and thrush is asymptomatic. Although circumcision alone is not enough protection, the risk of HIV is dramatically reduced, adding a further layer of safety to normal safe sex practices.
More comfortable.
Trapped pubic hairs are a thing of the past, and accidental rubbing on your zip fly doesn't hurt. My penis no longer gets sore after lengthy periods of sex.
There was nothing medically wrong with my foreskin, but I elected to remove it for purely cosmetic reasons, and I'm so glad I did.
There are a lot of arguments against circumcision, but most of them are moot. My penis gives me more pleasure nowadays, despite the warnings against removing nerve endings etc.
Most of the other arguments are based around infant circumcision. I do not personally agree that babies should be circumcised, so I agree with most of these.
However, in the context of an adult electing to be circumcised, I really can't see the problem, and unless the reasons are religious, I honestly can't fathom out why anyone would want to keep their foreskin.
...............................
A
male
reader, anonymous, writes (29 October 2008): A penis is a penis.
Circumsized or uncircumsized makes no difference at all. And any difference it does make is wishful thinking on the part of the person who thinks it.
I personally cannot fathom why on earth a guy would want anyone with a scalpel in their hands anywhere near such a vital area of a man's body.
Same with hot wax and shaving razors. It's just not natural.
Flynn 24
...............................
A
reader, anonymous, writes (29 October 2008): I would presume the same principles apply.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
Good luck.
...............................
A
male
reader, Cowboy +, writes (29 October 2008):
I have to respectfully disagree that the extra sensitivity of not being circumcised is an advantage.
I found it to be a huge disadvantage.
The problem is that it's the wrong kind of sensitivity!
Before I was circumcised, touching my glans was uncomfortable in the same way that touching your eyeball is. You can touch it carefully, but rubbing a dry finger across it is very uncomfortable.
Now that I am circumcised, the 'good' sensitivity is exactly the same as before, but the 'bad' sensitivity is gone.
Also, the skin is slightly thicker and no longer moist (has a similar texture to the skin on your lips) so I don't get sore from protracted sexual activity like I used to.
Because of this, I actually get more pleasure despite the 'decreased sensitivity' because it is more difficult to hurt me. It sorta filters out the discomfort while retaining all the good stuff.
I know it sounds counter intuitive, but I hope my explanation makes sense.
...............................
A
male
reader, Cowboy +, writes (28 October 2008):
I was circumcised a few years ago, so I know what it's like both ways.
You can get away with a lot more on a circumcised guy, for instance the odd tooth contact here and there won't hurt him anywhere near as bad.
I chose to be circumcised (in fact I did it myself, but that's another story...) and my enjoyment of oral sex has increased exponentially since.
I'd say carry on as normal, but a LOT more gently, as his unexposed glans will be a lot more sensitive.
...............................
A
reader, anonymous, writes (28 October 2008): Dont worry i have never been with a circumsized man before (i live in England).Basically the advantages of non-circumcision is that he will be more sensitive, more responsive to touch. He will also receive a higher level of pleasure, which is always fun! make sure hes all nice and clean first maybe have a bath together first it might loosen you up a little aswel because you will get used to the look and feel of him. most men like it when you lick or pull gently at the foreskin with your lips or teeth just be gentle at first.
like with most sex things youl get more confident when you see his reaction. good luck and dont worry about it, its natural xx
...............................
A
reader, anonymous, writes (28 October 2008): ... and up ... and down ... and up ... and down etc!
...............................
A
male
reader, anonymous, writes (28 October 2008): Lot of indian men I know are uncircumsized.Don't be scared...its very normal.Just be sure they wash it nicely before you do anything.You just have to pull the skin down when you do it.
...............................
|
