, posted
over a year ago
I kinda of agree, but then again, I kind of don't.
(by the way - only one person had given you feedback. Maybe it was the reply to the Pill question, I think that was a little confusing and inaccurate. I rated you an excellent and average on the other questions)
I think it is great to have a distinction between the rating that the question asker gives, and what the wider audience gives, I find that very interesting.
There are a few people on here who DO give bad advice, they clearly have their own agenda, constantly refer to their own negative experiences and are completely prejudice about giving advice based on their experiences, incapable of knowing that every persons experiences are unique and that just because a particular situation happened in a certain way for them, it does not mean another persons -seemingly- similar situation could be any thing like their own. For example, perhaps someone replies with "LEAVE HIM!!!" at least by seeing they have a 90% poor rating you can be more inclined to discount that well-meaning, yet ultimately life-changing two words and all important accompanying triple exclamation marks.
I think people who give excellent advice tend to take a case on its individual merit, does not appear judgemental, perhaps offers suggestions, compares the situation to their similar experiences [note: compare, not equate] and comes across as generally having "helped" the situation. They tend to support and encourage the question asker.
People have their own ways of doing this, and so of course people will choose the rating they personally feel is best.
Ultimately though, a high, or low, rating is indicative of nothing more than what the majority of people believed it to be. Where's the harm in that?
Posted on 6 October 2006 @ 14:48 (London time) - permalink
(Log in to flag spam/offensive/junk messages to moderators)
|